Background
From 2002 to late 2004, the NGO
Forum on Cambodia has been working with a network of mostly Cambodian NGOs
facilitated and assisted by the project staff of SADP, Oxfam GB, and the NGO
Forum on Cambodia. In part through the NGO Forum Forest Livelihoods Project,
a growing network of NGOs has provided assistance to communities living in and
near forest concession areas and plantation areas within some of Cambodia’s
more valuable forests.
The goal of the assistance has been
to increase the ability of local communities to protect their rights and
interests with respect to the use and management of forests and land.
Activities undertaken by the network of NGOs have included: village level
education on the relevant laws and government policies relating to the forest
sector; village, commune, district, province and national meetings of
community leaders and NGOs on forestry and plantation issues; and
consultations on laws and forest management planning documents to ensure that
communities understand the laws and policies that will impact on their rights
to access and use forestland. Additional activities undertaken include
educational campaigns to generate support for protecting community access to
forest resources, and initiatives to improve access to government and
parliamentary institutions and decision makers.
In January 2005, the capacity
building and networking functions of the Forest Livelihoods Project (Component
A) were transferred to Oxfam GB. However, NGO Forum still continues to
coordinate national level advocacy on forestry livelihood issues. In
particular, in 2005, the Forest Livelihoods Project successfully requested a
World Bank inspection of the World Bank-funded Forest Concession Project and
provided comments on an independent review of forest concession management
plans.
At the same time, the project has
broadened its focus, to respond to the growing number of communities whose
livelihoods and access to natural resources are being eroded by the granting
of large economic land concessions for the purpose of creating industrial tree
plantations. The project has established an NGO plantation network, bringing
concerned NGOs and community representatives working on plantation issues to
discuss and advocate their concerns with decision makers. An NGO working
group in Mondulkiri was established to liaise with government authorities and
respond to the growing conflict over a large pine tree plantation, exceeding
the maximum size permitted in the Land Law, which has taken land from
indigenous communities in seven communes, disrupting burial sites, spirit
forests, and grazing land. Representations were made to the government
regarding this economic land concession, and a similar large concession in
Kompong Chhang and Pursat provinces.
From 2002 to 2005, the major accomplishments of the
forestry project were the establishment of a nation-wide forestry network
involving a committed group of Cambodian NGOs and community leaders, with this
network receiving increasing visibility both domestically and
internationally. The network has contributed to the maintenance of the
ongoing moratorium on logging in concession areas (since January 2002), with
this including ensuring livelihood issues are considered in the process of
reviewing strategic level forest concession management plans and bringing to
light illegal logging activities of concessions. The forestry network has
also played a leading role in raising the profile of forest livelihoods issues
shifting the focus of the forest policy reform agenda towards viewing forestry
as a human rights issue. Community forestry committees have been elected in
many areas, with community forestry by-laws and regulations drafted and these
developments recognized in writing by local government officials in some
areas. The impacts of agro-industrial plantations and associated governance
issues have been brought to the attention of government-donor Consultative
Group process, and the government has taken some steps, though so far
inadequate, to respond to the needs of indigenous communities affected by
plantations.

Few issues have become more important
in Cambodia in recent years than access to land, forest and natural resources,
which represent an essential source of livelihood to Cambodia’s rural poor, yet
also a potential source of significant wealth to be exploited by national and
international companies together with Cambodia’s elite.
The problem of land and forest
management is hence an issue of livelihoods and an issue of governance. From a
livelihoods perspective, forest and land remain crucially important common
property resources. Forests and forestland provide a range of products used on
a daily basis to meet the subsistence needs of local communities. Moreover the
cutting and replacement of natural forest with agro-industrial plantations is
having a significant negative impact to people’s livelihood and the environment.
From a governance perspective, issues
associated with the utilization and management of forest resources and
forestland reflect broader problems with the management of state property.
Large portions of land are being handed over to companies in the form of
concessions with a life of 70 years or more, with little transparency or regard
to impacts on local communities. A number of concessions exceed the size limits
permitted by the Land Law, and most have failed to do environmental and social
impact assessments.
There is a need to build on previous
successes of the Forest Livelihoods and Plantation Project in order to continue
to promote debate, to raise problems and to brings the concern of NGOs and
affected communities to decision makers, government agencies, development
agencies and donors in order to protect people’s livelihood and the environment.
 |
|
 |
The concerns of
local communities affected by forest livelihood and plantations issues are
brought to the attention of the Cambodian
government, international aid agencies and the public.
|
 |
NGO advocacy on
forest livelihood and plantations issues is supported by relevant research.
|
 |
Gender concerns are
recognized and considered in project planning and implementation.
|

|