PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
REFORM
The Royal Government
of Cambodia has determined its new role in the society.
The role of the state is a strategist and partner in development.
It is willing to achieve a fair, just and peaceful society by acting as
an effective and efficient partner with the private sector and civil
society. Through this new role, the state needs to optimize the
sustainable use of its national resources, including human resources.
The state has to provide at least basic services to its people
effectively and efficiently. With this new role, the state needs a
public administration, which is neutral, more operational, transparent,
closer to the people, competent and responsible.
The
current issues in general administration, which the GAP addresses, are:
-
Low
salaries scale in the public sector
-
Corruption
in the public sector
-
Poor
quality of public services
-
Imbalance
between front office staff and back office staff
-
Lack
of accountability and transparency in public administration
Through the GAP, the
RGC has adopted a wide-ranging national program for administrative
reform that seeks to strengthen institutions and the legal framework,
good governance and public service delivery, human resource management
and change management. To encounter the current problems in
administration, the government is committed and addressing such issues
as: (i) further building their capacity to implement the reforms; (ii)
optimizing the organization of the work within the administration; (iii)
implementing a program to rationalize and to redeploy the workforce;
(iv) establishing priority mission groups, adequately remunerated, to
spearhead the reform; (v) implementing a program to improve motivation;
(vi) completing the restructuring and implementation of an automated
human resource management information system (HRMIS) and an automated
payroll; (vii) developing and implementing a program of
de-concentration.
The Governance Action
Plan addresses the following short-term (one year) and medium term (2-3
years) initiatives:
Short term:
1.
Urgently complete ongoing initiatives
2. Civil servant census and
the removal the irregularity
3.
Early step of functional analysis
4. Establish a computerized
personal management system
5.
Pay deployment and fiscal balance simulation
6.
Develop a strategy including comprehensive action plan, detail
sequencing and responsibilities for:
7. Rationalizing the pay and
employment structure, and skill distribution within the civil service
8.
Priority mission groups
9.
Personal management base on meritocracy
10.
Smooth information
flow within and among agency involve
11.
Timely payment of
living wage
12.
De-concentration
13.
Develop a strategy
and implementation plan and initiate the establishment of the priority
groups.
14.
Develop a strategy
to de-concentrate administrative functions.
15.
Promote
participation of line ministries in building broad ownership of plan.
16.
Undertake an
information session with stakeholders to disseminate the objectives and
activities of the
administrative reform.
Medium
term:
1. Continue to build the
capacity of the Council of Administrative Reform (CAR).
2. Complete the subsequent
phase of the functional analysis (Functional analysis should be done by
the
specialist under supervision of the
international consultant).
3.
Implementation of the deployment and rationalization phase of reform.
The Council for
Administrative Reform has a Secretariat in the Council of Ministers. The
Secretariat has capable people who understand the reform concepts, and
an international consultant to assist and guide them in their work.
In general, the
public administrative reform has made some notable progress compared to
other government reform programs, although there is so far limited
impact.
a)
Short term
The program has
completed the civil service census and removal of 9,000 irregulars from
the payroll. Back office activities have been mapped. The census
database is being turn in to a HRMIS. The automated payroll is now
operational. The study of employment and fiscal balance are now
complete. As a result, a modest salary increase was achieved in 2002,
although salaries are still far from being a living wage.
A gStrategy to
Rationalize the Civil Service 2002-2006h has been approved by the
Council of Ministers on October 19, 2001. The operational priorities of
administrative reform in 2002 were finalized by January 2002.
A strategy for
establishing Priority Mission Groups (PMG) has been prepared with
assistance of the ADB and UNDP. However, the detailed plan to implement
the PMG is in process and line ministries have yet to develop detailed
plans on how these PMGs will be identified and used. This reform is
expected to accelerate after a sub-decree on the PMGs is finalized.
A strategy to
de-concentrate the administration is an operational priority of the
administrative reform in 2002. However, it will need a comprehensive
strategy for implementation and more work on this is needed.
Ministries actively
participate through membership in inter-ministerial committees set up to
facilitate implementation of each National Program of Administrative
Reform (NPAR) initiative.
Public participation
and public consultation was partly achieved. The government officials
and donors were consulted and participated in the plan. However, further
civil society awareness of the program is needed.
In general most parts
of the short-term plan have been achieved or are in process.
b)
Long term
The capacity of the
CAR Secretariat has been built, and key staff of the Secretariat have
been given a financial incentive through being included in the PMGs. The
functional analysis of civil servants is in process. The deployment and
rationalization phase are just beginning and need more time to
implement.
Further details of
progress
The progress report
in the matrix below was prepared by the General-Secretariat of the
Council for Administrative Reform (CAR) GAP monitoring unit in December
2001. The CAR received information on all reform areas in the GAP and
summarized its findings in the progress report. The NGO Forum has made
additional comments (in italics) to update the GAP progress report
through interviews with donors, experts and technical persons in the
field. The table gives more
details on progress in achieving the short-term (one year) and
medium-term (2-3 years) goals.
Progress in
Administrative Reform*
| Actions
to take |
Current
status |
| Short
term Action (1 year) |
|
|
Urgently
complete ongoing initiatives which are required to help Government
develop a well-informed plan to rationalize and to redeploy the
workforce, including:
|
Partially completed, in
process
Part
of NPAR Phase One which was designed to establish appropriate
foundations for the management of the Civil Service has been
completed.
Completed.
Some
9,000 irregulars removed from the payroll. However, some government
staff who are no longer working for the government are still on
the payroll and their salaries are pocketed by their
supervisors.**
|
|
|
Partially completed, in
process
Back
office processes have been mapped and are being validated by
ministries. This stage was
finalized by February 2002 but the capacity of the counterparts in
line ministry has not sufficient to do the validation on time.
|
|
|
Partially completed, in
process
Census
database are being turned in to HRMIS. First three applications
including automated payroll are now operational. |
| Pay,
employment and fiscal balance simulation. |
Completed.
Used as basis for rationalization strategy. Study on safety nets
completed |
| Develop
a Strategy to Reform the Public Service detailing the sequencing and
responsibilities for: (a) rationalizing pay and employment
structure; (b) Priority groups; (c) Personnel management based on
meritocracy; (d) Smooth information flows within and between
agencies involved in managing the civil service; (e) Timely
payment of living wages; (f) Donor-paid supplementation; (g)
de-concentration: The
detailed plan should also ensure that all donor activities in this
area are consistent and coordinated. |
Completed
Strategy
to rationalize the civil service has been approved by the Council
of Ministers on October 19, 2001. Action plan for 2002 will ready
by end of December. Aide
Memoir on Administrative Reform circulated at the TOKYO CG
provides outline for key elements. TA relating to other elements
of strategy (e.g. special operating agencies, one window service
delivery and information technology) is being mobilized
The
strategy for rationalization was approved on October 19, 2001. The
new GAP will be available for discussion by April 2002. The
strategy to rationalize the civil service (2002-2005) includes (i)
new classification system (ii) new remuneration system, (iii)
Civil service rationalization, (iv) priority mission groups, (v)
Bring the administration closer to the people (vi) Capacity
strengthening.
The operational priorities of administrative reform for
2002 includes (i) Priority mission groups, (ii) Deconcentration,
(iii) Human resource development, (iv) IT and communications, (v)
strengthening the capacity of CAR secretariat |
| Develop
a strategy and
implementation plan for the establishment of priority groups that
will take into account risk factors and implications on the civil
service while other measures take hold. |
Partially completed, in process
Concept
document prepared with assistance of ADB; program being
articulated with assistance from UNDP; will be ready for
implementation starting in 2002. However,
the detailed plan to implement the PMG is in process and line
ministries have yet to develop detailed plans on how these PMGs
will be identified and used. This reform is expected to accelerate
after a sub-decree on the PMGs is finalized |
| Develop
a strategy to deconcentrate administrative functions to enhance
the capacity of provincial and district administrations to improve
service delivery and to support elected communal councils. |
Partially completed, in process
Strategy
Action Plan completed by end of December. Operational
priorities of the administrative reform for 2002 includes
deconcentration. |
| Promote
the participation of line ministries in building broad ownership
of the plan |
Partially completed, in process
Ministries
actively participate through membership in inter-ministerial
committees set up to facilitate implementation of each NPAR
initiative. The
effectiveness of these inter-ministerial committees should be
questioned and further enhanced. |
| Undertake
information sessions with stakeholders about the objectives and
activities of administrative reform. |
Partially completed, in process
Ongoing
through monthly newsletter and other means. Dissemination of NPAR
will also be a part of GAP dissemination campaign.
Regularly working sections held with external partners
under aegis of Donor Working Group on Administrative Reform. Press
interviews have been given, and presentations made at NGO and
donor-sponsored workshops. However,
the task is enormous, and the reform remains
invisible to many government staff and the general public. The
newsletter reaches mainly high-ranking officers of ministries.
There is a little informed media coverage, due in part to the
limitations of Cambodiafs media. |
| Medium
term (2-3 Years) |
|
| Continue
to build the capacity of the CAR General Secretariat to manage the
reform program. |
In
process
Strategy
and plan under development. Will include establishment of PMG at
CAR secretariat. |
| Complete
the subsequent phases of the functional analysis (service delivery
operations in remaining ministries, missions and mandates among
ministries). |
Not yet
Will
be initiated in 2002 in time for second phase of deconcentration
program. |
|
Implement
the redeployment and rationalization phase of the reform.
|
In process
SRCS
will be implemented starting January 2002, necessary preparatory
work will be completed by the end of December |
3.
Summary of NGO involvement in the sector
|
 |
CONTENT |
NGOs are not involved
in the technical side of administrative reform.
However, many NGOs are working with government counterparts.
Some have been contracted by government to perform health or
education services. NGOs in
the health sector are represented by MEDICAM, which maintains a close
dialogue with the Ministry of Health. In the education sector, EDUCAM
represents both NGOs and international organizations, while the NGO
Education Partnership (NEP) is representing specifically NGOs in policy
discussions.
The outcome of the
public administration reform will affect many NGOs activities in the
field. The administrative reform has the ultimate goal to provide better
basic services for the people and indirectly to improve the well being
of the people. This goal coincides with the goals of many NGOs.
NGOs
involved in this reform area have observed the following issues that
need to be addressed in implementation of administrative reform in the
GAP:
The reform program is
in process. The first stage of reform is now basically finished but it
will take much longer to achieve the long-term objectives.
As impacts are only expected in the later phases, there are so
far few observable impacts of the reform on the delivery of services.
The first stage has been largely technical in nature, and reliant
on donor-assisted projects. Subsequent
stages may have greater affect on vested interests, and will entail a
larger test of political will.
The following are the
concerns of NGOs related to these issues:
-
Low
salaries for civil servants
The low salaries in the public sector are the outstanding issue
in public administration today. It is the chief cause of the low
quality of public services such as in health and education, and a
major obstacle to efforts to counter corruption.
Ironically, the Ministry of Healthfs budget has been
greatly increased in recent years, but actual expenditures remain
much lower; these extra funds cannot be used for the most pressing
need, to increase salaries. The
Priority Mission Group will provide higher salaries to a very small
central group. While
this is most welcome, it does not solve the problem for the majority
of health workers and teachers throughout the country.
-
Late
payment of salaries
The introduction of a computerized and centralized payroll
system does not seem to have changed the chronic problem of late
salary payments, with delays of three months or more still being
reported. Contract teachers, who often work in remote areas of the
country where salaried staff are not prepared to work, do not
receive payment until many months after the expiry of their
contracts.
-
Failure
of the civil service census to identify much absenteeism
The civil service census was successful in identifying over
9,000 gghostsh and
removing them from the payroll. However, it was not successful in identifying many living
public servants who have changed jobs or who no longer show up for
work and whose salaries are pocketed by their supervisors. The reason is that when the census was held, these were the
first staff to be informed by their supervisors to attend. This group of people also constitutes a skilled group who may
be attracted back to the public service if salaries were
commensurate with that in the private sector.
-
Imbalance
of workforce in public sector
There is a need for quality service to the public, but there are
too many workers in gback officeh positions while too few people
working in gfront officeh positions. This will entail a big
change in the public service and more work and effort will be needed
to overcome overwhelming resistance.
Consideration needs to be given to the fact that redeployment
is not always possible, due to differences in skill requirements.
-
Lack
of skilled staff in remote areas
There are a lack of skilled teachers and health workers willing to
work in remote areas. Rural
areas can often only attract contract teachers who have no formal
teacher training. There
are insufficient incentives to work in remote areas, and Teacher
Training Centres are not targeting the training of teachers from the
remote areas.
-
Involvement
of private sector
Poor salaries in the public sector has led to the formation of
many private clinics, most of which are not following Ministry
guidelines regarding safe practices.
Cambodians are paying an average of $29 per person annually
on health services, while the public health budget is $2.1 per
person. There is a need
to bring the private sector back under control.
The health and education sectors are a social investment, and
must be managed by the government with enforced standards that apply
equally to private and public sectors.
-
Introduction
of user fees (see also under Public Finance Reform)
Low government revenues have necessitated the introduction of
user fees in the health sector.
There is concern among NGOs that exemption schemes for the
poor are not effective, as health centers know that allowing
exemptions will reduce their revenue.
Equity funding is needed to cover the cost of exemptions.
NGOs are happy to note that in the education sector the
elimination of entry fees has led to an increase in enrolments.
-
Corruption
in public sector
Corruption in the public sector is widespread among all
government institutions. In the education sector, corruption is
noticeable in college entrance procedures and in the deployment of
staff. In the health sector, there is still corruption and lack of
competitive procedures in the procurement of drugs.
In all sectors of government, corrupt payments are evident in
the delivery of almost all services and in selection of staff for
important positions. (See
separate chapter on Anti-Corruption).
-
Good
governance in the NGO sector
NGOs have advantages over government in implementing good
governance, due to their ability to pay living wages, the small size
of their operations, and the competitive environment in which they
compete for donor funding. Nevertheless,
they operate in the same cultural and legal environment as does the
government, and problems remain.
Measures to improve governance in the NGO sector have
included the promotion of a Code of Ethics for NGOs and its
dissemination during annual NGO Fairs, training programs in
financial and organizational management, and discussions and
workshops promoting the role of NGO boards.
Many local NGOs in Cambodia currently do not have properly
functioning boards. Many
NGOs undergo regular financial audits by internationally recognized
independent auditors, but more could do so.
Some NGO boards have instigated special audits when
management problems have come to light.
Recommendations
to Government:
-
The
government, with adequate donor support, should speed up the process
of administrative reform especially related to increased salaries in
social sectors. Salaries
of teachers and health workers should be given priority.
-
The
involvement of civil society groups in consultative processes should
be continued and expanded so that specialized NGOs could provide
some input into development of the strategy.
-
Efforts
to spread information to the public about the administrative reforms
should be continued and expanded, with dissemination through all
types of media. Awareness
should also be built among low ranking government officials.
Further workshops should be organized to provide an
opportunity for people to share input and discuss concerns.
-
There
should be detailed plans on how to address imbalances in the public
service, especially the lack of skilled staff in remote areas.
Adequate financial incentives have been shown to attract
health workers to remote areas.
In the education sector, Teacher Training Centres should have
quotas for students from remote areas, as students from these areas
are the most likely ones to be prepared to teach there.
Recommendations
to Donors:
-
Donor
should actively monitor the process and ensure that the desired
impact on the provision of services is achieved.
Pressure should be maintained for change, including the idea
of selection of people on merit, and the elimination of political
influence and nepotism.
-
Deconcentration
should be supported by projects that focus on building capacity for
provincial or district level planning.
The EQIP project, supported by the World Bank, is a good
example.
-
Donors
should consider supporting equity-funding schemes in the health
sector to help cover the cost of exemptions for the poor.
Recommendations
to NGOs:
-
NGOs
should play a role in monitoring the process of administration
reform and observe the impacts and affects of the reform on the
communities with whom they work.
A study on the affects of administrative reform on the
provision of basic services to the people could be conducted in
consultation with the government.
-
NGOs
should seek to further understand and spread awareness of the GAP
and provide their inputs in development of the plans and strategies
related to administrative reform such as:
a.
Analysis of function of public service
b.
Analysis of allocation of personnel
c.
Setting up standards for the PMGs
-
The
best contribution NGOs can make is to set a good example of good
governance themselves. Measures
should include training in proper financial and organizational
management, further dissemination of a Code of Ethics for NGOs, and
strengthening the role of NGO boards.
NGO peak bodies should study examples of self-regulation in
the NGO sector from other countries and devise appropriate
strategies for improving governance of the NGO sector in Cambodia.