Back

Introduction

In early 2002, NGOs in Cambodia decided that their NGO Statement to the 2002 Consultative Group Meeting would focus on poverty reduction, and that this statement would be their main source of new input to the National Poverty Reduction Strategy (NPRS).  This document provides a rapid comparison of the recommendations provided in the NGO Statement and the corresponding contents of the final NPRS.  

The NGO Statement was a collaborative effort between three NGO membership organizations, namely the Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC), the NGO Forum on Cambodia and the MEDiCAM association of NGOs working in health, together with contributions from various NGO sectoral networks.  The final document included a main statement followed by 22 sectoral and issues papers.  When NGO sectoral groups were invited to the 28-29 May NPRS workshop, they used their sectoral papers as their main written contribution to the small group discussions.  The NGO Statement was also presented by NGO delegates at the Consultative Group meeting on 19-21 June 2002, and is part of the official Consultative Group meeting documentation available on the web-site of the Council for the Development of Cambodia.  The NGO Statement built on and added to the existing NGO submissions to the national strategic planning process, namely: 

§         “Results of Initial Discussions among NGOs/CSOs on the National Poverty Reduction Strategy of Cambodia” (November 2000), a publication of the NGO Forum on Cambodia, produced after two months of sectoral discussions and the holding of a national workshop on the I-PRSP in October 2000 involving 85 NGO representatives.

§         “Results of NGO Discussions on the Draft Socio-Economic Development Plan” (August 2001), produced following a meeting of 32 NGO representatives from a variety of sectors in July 2001.

§         “NGO Recommendations to Enhance the Success of the RGC's Governance Action Plan” (June 2002), a publication of the NGO Forum on Cambodia, produced with the input of 6 focus groups discussions involving a total of 98 informants, plus 53 individual informants.  

Following distribution of the first draft of the NPRS in the 26-27 August 2002 National Workshop, the NGO Forum produced, in September 2002, a report entitled “Cambodia’s draft Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper – Has NGO Input Been Included?”  This report focused on the chapters in the first draft of the NPRS dealing with: the Macroeconomic Framework; Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Health; Education; Rural Development; Water Resource and Management; Land Policy and Urbanization; Trade; Gender; Natural Resources and Environment; and Governance.  It also made general comments on the participatory process and about the need for prioritization. 

Following release of the second draft on 30 October 2003, the NGO Forum produced “A Rapid Comparison of the NGO Statement to the 2002 CG Meeting and the Second Draft of the PRSP in Cambodia”, which is the predecessor of this report.  

The second and final drafts of the NPRS incorporated some of the issues raised in the above-mentioned report.  However, the addition of these issues in the main text is not likely to assure their execution unless they are also reflected in the NPRS matrices and related to costed actions with monitorable indicators.  There are also many other issues mentioned in the NGO Statement to the 2002 CG Meeting which are not reflected in the final draft of the NPRS.  It is not suggested that the final NPRS should necessarily include all these issues.  Indeed, NGOs have emphasized that the NPRS should undergo a prioritization exercise to determine what should be included and what should not.  Also, the NPRS is just one of many government documents, and many NGO recommendations may well be heeded without their explicit inclusion in the NPRS. 

It is hoped that this rapid assessment will provide a useful tool for assessing which NGO recommend-ations have been included in the final revision of the NPRS, and where there is room for further NGO advocacy.  For explanation of the issues from which these recommendations arise, please refer to the full text of the NGO Statement to the 2002 CG Meeting.


Back