Agriculture and Rural Development
|
NGO
Statement to the 2002 CG Meeting |
Final
Draft of the NPRS |
|
|
|
|
·
A decentralized and small
farmer oriented national research and extension system should be put in
place. This should include supporting the initiatives and efforts of
farmers in organizing themselves in associations or cooperatives. |
Small farmer oriented research and extension is
mentioned in the text. Support to farmers organizations is mentioned in
the Action Plan Matrix. |
|
|
|
|
·
There is a need for public
investment both in physical and human resource management as well as in
technology development. The public research center should be set up
according to specific agro-ecosystem, such as rainfed lowland, upland,
annual flooded agro-ecosystems. It should be linked with a decentralized
extension team or unit, which should be based at district level. |
Included. |
|
|
|
|
·
Allocation of resources for
the support of research and extension program should be based on the
quality of proposals and program implementation. Research and extension
agencies are challenged to develop program proposals if good quality.
Community-based organizations and NGOs should be allowed to participate in
this process, so that there are pluralistic and responsible service
provision systems. |
Not explicitly included. |
|
|
|
|
·
With regards to research and
extension, the priority should be given to pro-small farmer initiatives
and/or innovative approaches in intensifying and diversifying agricultural
production based on sustainable and low external input principles.
These should not only seek to intensify rice production, but also
to diversify agricultural production to cope with the problem of food
security and malnutrition. The
system of rice intensification (SRI) or the system of improved practices
in water, plant, soil and nutrient management is one example of an
innovative approach. SRI is being developed in Madagascar and it is
introduced by CEDAC, a Cambodian NGO, in 2000. Now, SRI has been validated
by 500 Cambodian farmers, mainly by farmers supported by CEDAC and other
organizations such as Prasac II (European Union Funded Project) and GTZ.
It has proven to be an appropriate innovation since it allows farmers to
increase production up to 150%, with minimal or zero expenditure on
agro-chemical.[1] This approach conserves
water (up to 50%) which brings big economic and environmental benefits for
irrigated rice farming in the dry season. SRI is also an important means
for farmers to diversify their rice-based farming systems because once
they can get higher rice production from their small plot, they are ready
to covert some of their rice fields for growing upland crops and digging a
pond and canal for practicing fish culture. This is good for improvement
of nutrition, income, and landscape diversity. |
The SRI approach is included in the text.
However, there is no corresponding action, budget or indicator in
the Action Plan Matrix. |
|
|
|
|
·
There is a need for effective enforcement of the sub-decree
on agricultural material standards, especially the regulation on pesticide
use, to ensure that all Class I pesticides are totally banned from being
traded and used in Cambodia. In addition, the sub-decree should be revised
to include some Class II pesticides, especially DDT and Chlordane, in
the list of pesticides to be banned. |
Only partly included since there is no discussion of
the need to revise the sub-decree. |
|
|
|
|
·
In addition to the
enforcement of regulations, public education programs should launch to
ensure that farmers and consumers have access to information on pesticides
and their hazards. |
Included. |
|
|
|
|
·
Resources and efforts should
go to develop a system of rural education, especially training for the
rural youth in agriculture and agriculture related business. This training
should be combined with loan program so that they can invest to start-up
small enterprises in agriculture and agriculture related sector or other
rural enterprises. |
Developing a system for rural education aiming at
rural youth is mentioned, but no reference to resources such as a loan
program. |
|
|
|
|
·
Focus on supporting farmer organizations so that farmers can
take a more leading role in agricultural development and marketing. |
There is a reference to “strengthen agricultural
marketing system and market access for small-scale farmers and rural
producers.” “Strengthening of existing farmer organizations”
included in the Action Plan matrix. |
[1] Koma, Yang Saing (2002)